Not logged inOpenClonk Forum
- - By Günther [de] Date 2009-05-19 17:50
A single sky background is boring. Moving clouds would be the obvious solution. And they do not require 3d model support :-)
- Graphics. Difficult balance between not showing any repeating patterns and not requiring too much Video RAM.
- Scripts. Rain and lightnings. Clouds interacting with the landscape would be cool, and make for more interesting scenario design.
- The obsolete engine support for the old invisible clouds and lightnings should be removed.

Any takers?
Reply
Parent - - By K-Pone [de] Date 2009-05-20 14:59
I think layers are also good for clouds. Simply some graphics with 2 or 3 clouds on it and the rest of the image is transparent and these graphics will scroll with different speed. And this also don't need 3D support.
Parent - By Luchs [de] Date 2009-05-20 15:33

>Simply some graphics with 2 or 3 clouds on it


Dynamic! :I
Parent - - By Zapper [de] Date 2009-05-20 15:46
But it needs real huge areas to be blitted and a lot of memory
Parent - - By Günther [de] Date 2009-05-20 16:53
Not necessarily: Clouds can probably be stored in a lower resolution, and a few blits shouldn't be a huge deal for GPUs.
Reply
Parent - By Sven2 [us] Date 2009-05-20 17:20
Large, transparent, modulted blits used to be major GPU hogs. I had implemented clouds as large, upscaled objects e.g. in The Lost Messenger, but had to reduce their number a lot to make the scenario playable on slower comps.

The situation has probably improved. But then, if we introduce PixelShaders for all such blits and generally assume larger resolutions, things could get worse again.
Parent - - By MrBeast [de] Date 2009-05-20 15:53 Edited 2009-05-20 16:04
Hm... i made something like this in RdW-Re with particles. It looks nice but eats some performance, too.

I hereby license the following file(s) under the CC-by license
Attachment: Clouds1.jpeg (51k)
Reply
Parent - - By Nachtfalter [de] Date 2009-05-20 16:29
Imo not really nice. Big unperfomant grey blobs.
Reply
Parent - - By MrBeast [de] Date 2009-05-20 16:58
Then show me some better 2D Cloud effects...
Reply
Parent - By MimmoO Date 2009-05-21 12:46
epic pwnage :>
Parent - - By MrBeast [de] Date 2009-05-21 12:51
The problem is that it is not realy possible to make it dynamic...
Reply
Parent - - By Zapper [de] Date 2009-05-21 13:34
Why that?
Parent - - By MrBeast [de] Date 2009-05-21 13:48
They look like they woud be only some (goodlooking) sprites which are fling around. Animation will look bad cause because the cloud can only change its whole look bot not of parts of it but real clouds normaly change their look instantly... and this is not really possible with these static cloud graphics.
Reply
Parent - - By Zapper [de] Date 2009-05-21 14:50
Of course. It is not one giant animated cloud. But I think one could still make quite a nice effect just with small sprites
Parent - By Newton [es] Date 2009-05-21 15:01
I think it could create a nice effect if the actual cloud objects were invisible but would spawn a couple of attached cloud particles in different sizes around them which would gradually fade out and be replaced by other cloud particles (fading in).
Parent - By Nachtfalter [de] Date 2009-05-21 15:58
If we made a 3D cloud modell (rendered) which grows in...20 pictures? - and we mix it with three cloud modells we are fine dynamic. Much better than CPU-sucking particle clouds.
Reply
Parent - - By Newton [es] Date 2009-05-31 11:04
So, are you up for the task or what?

I find the clouds of sid meiers pirates nice too http://www.mhvt.net/quicktime/eng/graphics/pc_games/sid_meier_pirates.jpg
They are just some big cloud sprites in different shapes - like your clouds. That they don't change their shape is not so striking.
Parent - - By Nachtfalter [de] Date 2009-05-31 14:49
2D Sprites or realtime model?
Reply
Parent - By Newton [es] Date 2009-05-31 15:07
You mean the game? They are sprites. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zc6CxTE9IuM

Powered by mwForum 2.29.7 © 1999-2015 Markus Wichitill