Not logged inOpenClonk Forum
Up Topic General / Feedback and Ideas / Destruction of Buildings
- - By Enrique [de] Date 2009-04-28 17:49
Buildings should not burn "down" like in CR. In my opinion, the building should burn firstly (but not get smaller!) untill the hohle construction decays. So only a heap of rubble lasts. In Melees it would be a tactic, because you cannot build something on the heap of rubble. After a short time, the heap should start to fade out, so that the place is free for new buildings.
It would also be nice, if every building has a decayanimation. Clonks standing in front of the decaying building will take damage and maybe incinerated.

Bad selfmade example:

I hereby license the following file(s) under the CC-by license
Reply
Parent - - By MimmoO Date 2009-04-28 18:13
i like this idea. i misliked it in CR, so if it would be changed here, it would be great. i think, those "heap of rubble" should disable building, but has no solidmask, it should be in background. alternative there could be a rule, which changes this, so a high, but burnt tower would still block the road.
Parent - By Isilkor Date 2009-04-28 18:16

> those "heap of rubble" should disable building


You could have the rubble be removable and return some of the construction materials.
Reply
Parent - By Maddin Date 2009-04-28 18:36
I think, animations would be too complicated. Throwing some woodplankparticles and dust seems to be a good solution?
Parent - - By Nachtfalter [de] Date 2009-04-28 18:53
I prefer a building-up animation.
Reply
Parent - - By Caesar [de] Date 2009-04-28 20:01 Edited 2009-04-28 20:03
The one who works, decides.
Btw, which style? The planks popping into existance step by step, or everything with moves, so the bars are lifted softly, and then there are walls lifted from nowhere, or what?
Parent - By Zapper [de] Date 2009-04-28 20:44
Fading in of the planks and stuff looks quite okay (see CX, workshop constructions). But you cannot do that if you only have walls and no single parts of course
Parent - - By Enrique [de] Date 2009-04-29 14:00
As Zapper said but with scaffold (GerĂ¼st).
Reply
Parent - - By Nachtfalter [de] Date 2009-04-29 18:12
Why you add German words? ...
Reply
Parent - By Caesar [de] Date 2009-04-29 18:29
Hm. That the not so skilled ones don't have to look it up. You usually don't use scaffolds.
Parent - - By Enrique [de] Date 2009-04-29 18:51
Because i am unsure, if my translator gives me the right translations, so another one can correct me, because he knows the sense.
And also to give those "not-perfect-english-speakers" a little bit help so they don't need to look it up.
Reply
Parent - By Nachtfalter [de] Date 2009-04-29 20:06
Maybe you should add a note to this words, so you dont screw up english users.
Reply
Parent - By Asmageddon [pl] Date 2009-06-22 19:18
I think, that buildings creation/destruction animations should be based on layers. Example.: Wooden hut is build following way: First is build wooden skeleton, then planks appear, and in the end doors and windows appear. Example image: http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr348/Asmageddon/Construction.jpg

Over are layers. Under is shown how construction animation would look.
I think, that destruction animations should be based on layers too: First straw starts to burn, then planks get scorched, then they burn completly and only burnt wooden skeleton is left. Also animation should be much faster than in Clonk Rage
Reply
Up Topic General / Feedback and Ideas / Destruction of Buildings

Powered by mwForum 2.29.7 © 1999-2015 Markus Wichitill